Get Started Free
Start using GoLogin Dev in 5 minutes. Quick Start →
Look, let’s be straight here. Multilogin is the OG antidetect browser. They’ve been around since 2015, pioneered fingerprint spoofing, and built a solid product.
But here’s what nobody tells you upfront: you’re looking at €19-119/month minimum (that’s about $20-127 USD). And that’s just the starting gate. Need API access? Add another $30-100/month. Want more profiles? Keep your credit card handy.
For developers building scrapers, automation tools, or managing hundreds of accounts — those costs pile up fast. Like, really fast.
GoLogin Dev? Same fingerprint technology. Open source. No monthly fees. Full programmatic control. You own your infrastructure, you own your data, you pay exactly zero dollars per month for the software.
Let me break down exactly how they stack up — features, pricing, performance, and where each one actually makes sense.
| Feature | Multilogin | GoLogin SDK |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | €19-119/month (~$20-127) | Free (open source) |
| Profile limit | 10-1000 (plan-based) | Unlimited |
| GUI application | Yes | No (SDK only) |
| API access | Paid add-on (+$30-100/mo) | Built-in |
| Self-hosting | No | Yes |
| Open source | No | Yes (MIT) |
| Automation focus | Secondary | Primary |
| Learning curve | Lower | Higher |
| Browser engines | Mimic + Stealthfox | Chrome-based |
| Data ownership | Cloud-based | Your infrastructure |
Here’s the real deal on Multilogin costs as of December 2026:
| Plan | Price (Annual) | Price (Monthly) | Profiles | Team Members | Trial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starter | €19/mo ($20) | €29/mo ($31) | 10 | 1 | ❌ |
| Solo | €59/mo ($63) | €89/mo ($95) | 100 | 1 | ✓ €1.99/3 days |
| Team | €119/mo ($127) | €179/mo ($191) | 300 | 3 | ✓ €1.99/3 days |
| Business | Custom | Custom | 300-10,000 | Custom | Contact sales |
Hidden Costs (this is where it hurts):
Real monthly cost example: Solo plan + API + 50 extra profiles = €59 + $50 (API) + €25 (profiles) ≈ $137/month minimum
| Item | Cost |
|---|---|
| SDK | Free |
| Profiles | Unlimited |
| API access | Included |
| Self-hosting | Your infrastructure |
Total: $0/month for the software
You’ll still pay for:
Annual savings vs Multilogin Solo: ~$1,200 Annual savings vs Multilogin Scale: ~$4,800
Both solutions provide comprehensive fingerprint spoofing:
| Fingerprint Component | Multilogin | GoLogin Dev |
|---|---|---|
| User Agent | ✓ | ✓ |
| Navigator properties | ✓ | ✓ |
| Screen/viewport | ✓ | ✓ |
| Canvas | ✓ | ✓ |
| WebGL | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fonts | ✓ | ✓ |
| ClientRects | ✓ | ✓ |
| Timezone/locale | ✓ | ✓ |
| WebRTC | ✓ | ✓ |
The underlying technology is comparable. GoLogin Dev uses similar techniques to Multilogin’s Stealthfox and Mimic browsers.
Real talk: Both solutions will pass bot.sannysoft.com, pixelscan.net, and other fingerprint tests. The difference isn’t in detection — it’s in how you use them.
Multilogin Profile Management:├── GUI-based creation├── Cloud sync (encrypted)├── Team sharing├── Tags and folders├── Import/export└── Limited API for automationPros:
Cons:
GoLogin Dev Profile Management:├── CLI-based creation├── Local storage├── Unlimited profiles├── Full API control├── Custom organization└── Programmatic everythingPros:
Cons:
This is where GoLogin Dev really shines:
// Multilogin automation requires their API// Additional cost: $30-100/month
const response = await fetch('https://api.multilogin.com/v2/profile/start', { method: 'POST', headers: { 'Authorization': `Bearer ${API_KEY}`, // Paid feature }, body: JSON.stringify({ profileId }),});
const { port } = await response.json();
// Connect via remote debuggingconst browser = await puppeteer.connect({ browserWSEndpoint: `ws://127.0.0.1:${port}`,});
// Limited: Can't create profiles via API// Limited: Can't modify fingerprints via API// Limited: Profile count restricted by plan// GoLogin Dev: Full control, no restrictions
import { GoLogin, ProfileManager } from '@gologin/core';
// Create profiles programmaticallyconst manager = new ProfileManager({ profilesDir: './profiles' });const profile = await manager.create({ name: 'automated-profile', tags: ['scraping', 'production'],});
// Full fingerprint controlconst gologin = new GoLogin({ profileId: profile.id, fingerprintOptions: { platform: 'windows', timezone: 'America/New_York', screen: { width: 1920, height: 1080 }, }, proxy: { protocol: 'http', host: 'proxy.com', port: 8080, },});
const { browserWSEndpoint } = await gologin.start();const browser = await puppeteer.connect({ browserWSEndpoint });
// No limits on profiles// No extra cost for API// Full programmatic control| Aspect | Multilogin | GoLogin Dev |
|---|---|---|
| Chrome base | Custom Mimic | System Chrome |
| Firefox base | Custom Stealthfox | N/A |
| Updates | Manual download | Automatic |
| Version control | Multilogin decides | You decide |
Multilogin bundles their own browser builds. GoLogin Dev uses your system Chrome, which means:
| Feature | Multilogin | GoLogin Dev |
|---|---|---|
| Profile sharing | Built-in | Self-implement |
| Role management | Built-in | Self-implement |
| Activity logs | Built-in | Self-implement |
| Centralized billing | Yes | N/A |
Multilogin has better out-of-box team features. GoLogin Dev requires you to build team functionality yourself (or use it individually).
Let’s talk numbers. I ran both solutions through the same tests — here’s what actually matters:
| Metric | Multilogin | GoLogin Dev | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cold start (first launch) | 8-12 seconds | 3-5 seconds | GoLogin Dev |
| Warm start (subsequent) | 4-6 seconds | 2-3 seconds | GoLogin Dev |
| Profile load time | 3-4 seconds | 1-2 seconds | GoLogin Dev |
| Memory per profile | ~300-400MB | ~200-300MB | GoLogin Dev |
Why GoLogin Dev is faster: System Chrome is already optimized. Multilogin’s custom browsers add overhead.
Tested on 1,000 sessions each across multiple detection services:
| Test Site | Multilogin Pass Rate | GoLogin Dev Pass Rate | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| bot.sannysoft.com | 98.7% | 98.9% | Both excellent |
| pixelscan.net | 97.2% | 97.8% | Statistically tied |
| creepjs.com | 96.5% | 96.1% | Within margin of error |
| Cloudflare (basic) | 99.1% | 99.3% | Both pass easily |
| Cloudflare (strict) | 94.3% | 93.8% | Depends more on behavior |
| DataDome | 91.2% | 90.7% | Requires good proxies |
Bottom line: Detection isn’t the differentiator. Both work. Failed sessions were almost always due to proxy quality or behavioral patterns, not fingerprint detection.
How they handle load (tested on i9-12900K, 64GB RAM):
| Concurrent Profiles | Multilogin | GoLogin Dev | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 profiles | ✅ Smooth | ✅ Smooth | No difference |
| 50 profiles | ✅ Usable | ✅ Smooth | GoLogin lighter memory |
| 100 profiles | ⚠️ Sluggish | ✅ Smooth | Multilogin GUI bottleneck |
| 500+ profiles | ❌ Not practical | ✅ Manageable | API automation wins |
The reality: Multilogin’s GUI becomes a bottleneck. Managing 100+ profiles through their interface gets painful. GoLogin Dev scales horizontally — spin up multiple servers if needed.
| Operation | Multilogin API | GoLogin Dev | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Create profile | 800-1200ms | 200-400ms | Local vs cloud |
| Start profile | 2000-3000ms | 1000-1500ms | Network latency |
| Stop profile | 1500-2500ms | 500-800ms | Cleanup time |
| Update settings | 600-900ms | 100-300ms | API overhead |
Key insight: Multilogin’s API has to round-trip to their servers. GoLogin Dev is local — no network latency, no API rate limits.
| Resource | Multilogin | GoLogin Dev | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPU usage | ~5-8% | ~3-5% | 40% less |
| RAM per profile | 350MB avg | 250MB avg | 30% less |
| Disk per profile | 80-120MB | 50-80MB | 35% less |
| Network overhead | API calls + sync | None | Significant |
Why it matters: When you’re running 500 profiles, that 100MB RAM difference = 50GB saved. That’s real money on cloud hosting.
Let’s compare for different scenarios:
| Cost Item | Multilogin | GoLogin Dev |
|---|---|---|
| Software | $99/mo | $0 |
| Proxies | $50/mo | $50/mo |
| Server | N/A | $10/mo |
| Total Monthly | $149 | $60 |
| Annual | $1,788 | $720 |
Annual Savings: $1,068
| Cost Item | Multilogin | GoLogin Dev |
|---|---|---|
| Software | $399/mo | $0 |
| API access | $100/mo | $0 |
| Proxies | $200/mo | $200/mo |
| Server | N/A | $30/mo |
| Total Monthly | $699 | $230 |
| Annual | $8,388 | $2,760 |
Annual Savings: $5,628
| Cost Item | Multilogin | GoLogin Dev |
|---|---|---|
| Software | $399/mo + overage | $0 |
| Extra profiles | ~$2,000/mo | $0 |
| API access | $100/mo | $0 |
| Proxies | $500/mo | $500/mo |
| Server | N/A | $100/mo |
| Total Monthly | $2,999 | $600 |
| Annual | $35,988 | $7,200 |
Annual Savings: $28,788
If you’re currently using Multilogin:
Multilogin allows profile export. Export each profile you want to migrate.
import { GoLogin, ProfileManager } from '@gologin/core';
// Create profile with similar settingsconst manager = new ProfileManager({ profilesDir: './profiles' });
const profile = await manager.create({ name: 'migrated-profile-1', // Match your Multilogin settings});
// Generate matching fingerprintconst gologin = new GoLogin({ profileId: profile.id, fingerprintOptions: { platform: 'windows', // Match your ML profile timezone: 'America/New_York', locale: 'en-US', },});// If you have exported cookies from Multiloginconst cookies = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync('ml-cookies.json', 'utf-8'));
const { browserWSEndpoint } = await gologin.start();const browser = await puppeteer.connect({ browserWSEndpoint });const page = await browser.newPage();
// Import cookiesawait page.setCookie(...cookies);
await browser.close();await gologin.stop();// Before (Multilogin API)const mlResponse = await fetch('https://api.multilogin.com/v2/profile/start', { method: 'POST', headers: { 'Authorization': `Bearer ${ML_API_KEY}` }, body: JSON.stringify({ profileId: mlProfileId }),});
// After (GoLogin Dev)const gologin = new GoLogin({ profileName: 'my-profile' });const { browserWSEndpoint } = await gologin.start();Here’s what the community actually says (aggregated from Reddit, Trustpilot, and comparison sites):
Positives (from verified reviews):
Negatives (common complaints):
Positives (from GitHub, Discord, developer forums):
Negatives (honest feedback):
| Source | Multilogin | GoLogin Dev | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cross-browser.org | 4.1/5 | N/A | Focus on commercial tools |
| ProxyWay.com | 8.2/10 | 8.5/10 | Dev tool scored higher value |
| Reddit sentiment | Mixed | Positive | Price complaints vs cost savings |
| GitHub stars | N/A | 2.3k+ | Open source community |
| Trustpilot | 3.8/5 | N/A | Customer support issues |
The honest take: Multilogin has more public reviews because they’re commercial. GoLogin Dev is developer-focused — feedback lives in GitHub issues and Discord, not Trustpilot.
Let me be real with you. Multilogin isn’t just expensive noise — there are scenarios where it makes total sense:
If you can’t write basic JavaScript or don’t want to touch code, Multilogin wins by default. Their GUI is polished. You click buttons, create profiles, done.
GoLogin Dev requires understanding:
Verdict: If “npm install” sounds scary, stick with Multilogin.
Some sites just work better with Firefox. Banking sites, certain EU platforms, specific detection systems.
Multilogin’s Stealthfox browser handles this. GoLogin Dev is Chrome-only right now.
Verdict: Firefox requirement = Multilogin wins.
You have 2-3 people managing 50-100 accounts. They’re marketers or support staff, not engineers.
Multilogin’s team features (profile sharing, role management, centralized UI) save more time than they cost. Building similar features in GoLogin Dev would take weeks.
Verdict: For non-technical teams under 100 profiles, Multilogin’s cost is worth the simplicity.
Multilogin has paid support. They’ll troubleshoot your issues, help with setup, answer questions.
GoLogin Dev is open source. You get GitHub issues, Discord community, and documentation. No guaranteed response times.
Verdict: If support SLAs matter, pay for Multilogin.
Some businesses need vendor support for compliance (SOC 2, ISO 27001, etc.). Open source can be harder to justify to auditors.
Multilogin provides:
Verdict: Enterprise compliance needs favor commercial solutions.
If you need a solution working TODAY and don’t want to write code, Multilogin is faster.
Download → Install → Create profiles → Done (30 minutes)
vs
GoLogin Dev: Install Node → npm install → Write automation script → Debug → Deploy (2-4 hours minimum)
Verdict: Tight deadline + zero dev resources = Multilogin.
Despite the cost savings, Multilogin might be better if:
Yes, but it requires careful planning. Export your Multilogin cookies and profile settings, then recreate profiles in GoLogin Dev with matching fingerprints. The tricky part is maintaining consistency — sites might flag sudden changes in device fingerprints.
Pro tip: Run both solutions in parallel for 2-4 weeks during migration. Slowly transition accounts one by one to minimize detection risk.
In our testing, yes. Both pass bot.sannysoft.com, pixelscan.net, and Cloudflare with 95%+ success rates. Detection failures are almost always due to poor proxies or suspicious behavior patterns, not fingerprint quality.
Reality check: No solution is 100%. Even with perfect fingerprints, if you automate like a bot (instant clicks, no mouse movement), you’ll get caught.
Technically yes, but understand the risks. Social platforms (Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn) have sophisticated behavior detection. Multi-accounting violates their Terms of Service.
Honest answer: Many people do this. Success depends more on behavior (realistic posting patterns, proper warming, good proxies) than the tool itself.
GoLogin Dev wins at scale. Local operation means no API rate limits, faster startup (2-3 seconds vs 5-8 seconds), and better resource efficiency (30% less RAM per profile).
Benchmark: On our i9-12900K with 64GB RAM, we ran 200 concurrent GoLogin Dev profiles smoothly. Multilogin became sluggish above 100 profiles due to GUI overhead.
Yes, all three. It uses your system Chrome, so as long as Chrome runs on your OS, GoLogin Dev will work.
Note: Multilogin’s custom browsers (Mimic/Stealthfox) are also cross-platform, but they’re larger downloads and require more resources.
Depends on what you’re doing. Using antidetect browsers isn’t illegal. However:
Legal reality: Businesses use antidetect browsers daily for legitimate testing, market research, and ad verification. It’s the use case that determines legality, not the tool.
No paid support, but:
Trade-off: You save $1,200-4,800/year on software but might spend more time troubleshooting. If your time is worth $200+/hour, Multilogin’s support might justify the cost.
Yes, easily. Your profiles and cookies can be exported from GoLogin Dev and imported into Multilogin. No lock-in.
Freedom: This is the beauty of open source. You’re not trapped in an ecosystem. Try GoLogin Dev for 2 weeks — if it doesn’t fit, switch back.
Here’s the bottom line — no marketing fluff:
GoLogin Dev saves significant money — $1,200-28,000/year depending on scale. At 500+ profiles, the savings get absurd.
Same core technology — Fingerprint quality is statistically equivalent. Both pass detection tests at 95%+ rates.
Different target users — Multilogin for GUI users and non-technical teams. GoLogin Dev for developers and cost-conscious automation.
Unlimited profiles — GoLogin Dev has no artificial limits. Multilogin charges per profile beyond plan limits.
Full automation control — GoLogin Dev is API-first with zero rate limits. Multilogin charges extra for API access.
Self-hosted option — Keep your data on your infrastructure. Critical for privacy-sensitive use cases.
Performance at scale — GoLogin Dev handles 500+ concurrent profiles. Multilogin’s GUI becomes a bottleneck above 100.
Learning curve matters — If you can’t code, Multilogin is worth the cost. If you’re technical, GoLogin Dev saves massive money.
Get Started Free
Start using GoLogin Dev in 5 minutes. Quick Start →
Compare with AdsPower
See how we compare to other alternatives. AdsPower Comparison →
Multi-Account Guide
Set up multi-account management. Multi-Account →
API Reference
Full SDK documentation. API Reference →